Se rendre au contenu

Inclusion of Chrysotile Asbestos in the Rotterdam Convention

2010:01

Whereas 1

  • According to the Rotterdam Convention’s review committee, chrysotile (the dominant form of asbestos found in Canada) is unequivocally a human carcinogen.
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international agencies agree, and Canada acknowledges that all forms of asbestos fibers, including chrysotile, are carcinogenic.

Whereas 2

  • Canada is the only western democracy to have consistently opposed international efforts to regulate the global trade in asbestos.
  • For several years, Canada has led opposition to listing chrysotile under the Rotterdam Convention.

Whereas 3

  • The sale of asbestos is illegal in Canada.
  • Data show increasing consumption of Canadian asbestos under the sales activities of Chrysotile Canada Inc.

Resolved 1

  • That the National Council of Women of Canada adopt as policy the inclusion of chrysotile asbestos as a dangerous substance in the Rotterdam Convention.

Resolved 2

  • That the National Council of Women of Canada urge the Government of Canada to include chrysotile asbestos as a dangerous substance in the Rotterdam Convention.

Resolved 3

  • That the National Council of Women of Canada urge the Government of Canada to ratify the Rotterdam Convention without delay.